Horstman v. General Electric Company
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BROADDUS, Special Commissioner.
Appellant filed suit for actual and punitive damages, claiming that respondent failed to give him a proper service letter pursuant to the terms and provisions of Section 290.140 RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. In particular appellant alleges that he was damaged by the failure of respondent to state the true cause for his discharge from employment. The undisputed facts show that appellant was employed by Hotpoint, a division of Respondent General Electric Company, from July 2, 1956 to September 7, 1966; that appellant was discharged from the employ of respondent on August…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Christy v. PetrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Walbridge v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Lyons v. St. Joseph Belt Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
- Brink's, Inc. v. Hoyt. Hoyt v. Brink's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Comerio v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
- Bliven v. Brunswick Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bigham v. McCall Service Stations, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sisters of St. Mary v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cordon v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.