Clare v. Crittenden
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Hew York county. Action by .Almira B. Clare against Edward W. Crittenden for damages for breach of contract. The answer denied the damage, and set up a counterclaim, to which a reply was served, and the cause was noticed for trial by both parties for the January term, 1887. The case was first reached on the day calendar for trial on October 7, 1887, and was set down for October 12, and on that day was marked “Reserved generally.”
Read the full summary
Appeal from special term, Hew York county. Action by .Almira B. Clare against Edward W. Crittenden for damages for breach of contract. The answer denied the damage, and set up a counterclaim, to which a reply was served, and the cause was noticed for trial by both parties for the January term, 1887. The case was first reached on the day calendar for trial on October 7, 1887, and was set down for October 12, and on that day was marked “Reserved generally.” Hothing further was done by either party until July 16, 1890. On that day defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to…
1Per curiam
This appeal is clearly frivolous, and the order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Jacot v. MarksNew York Supreme Court · 1899
- Oehlhof v. SolomonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910