Legal Opinion

Jacot v. Marks

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion to dismiss complaint, for neglect to prosecute action.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint, with costs, for unreasonable (julay on the part of the plaintiffs in prosecuting the action. The motion is made under section 822 of the Code, and, also, since the action is triable by. a jury, under rule 86 of the General Buies of Practice, which refers only to cases triable by a jury. See Galkin v. Beattie, 4 Law Bull. 42. .The above section of the Code provides that where the plaintiff unreasonably neglects to proceed in the action, the court may, in its discretion, dismiss the complaint, upon the application of the defendant, and render judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clare v. CrittendenNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Jefferson v. Capital City Oil CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Fox v. Perpetual National Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wutchumna Water Co. v. StevensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Welch v. McCoySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. National City Bank v. International Trading Co. of America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API