Legal Opinion

Quan v. Computer Sciences Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 2010No. 19-56224PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENNETT, District Judge:

This is a class action pursuant to ERISA by participants in an employer’s 401(k) plan against named and defacto fiduciaries of the plan. The participants appeal the district court’s order granting the fiduciaries’ summary judgment motion on the participants’ claims that the fiduciaries 1) imprudently invested plan assets in the employer’s stock; 2) negligently misrepresented and failed to disclose material information about the employer’s finances and operations; and 3) failed to properly appoint, monitor, and inform the retirement plans committee and its…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Donovan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Pugh v. Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Save Our Valley v. Sound TransitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. Ex Rel. Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers Retirement Plan v. Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Fifth Third Bancorp v. DudenhoefferSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Brown v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. Lanfear v. Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. In Re Citigroup ERISA LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API