Legal Opinion

People v. Sheeley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1957No. Crim. 3238PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Convicted of forgery, a violation of section 470 of the Penal Code, defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence at the trial. He claims (1) insufficiency of evidence at the preliminary examination because, he asserts, without the use of his extrajudicial statements there was no proof of the corpus delicti, and (2) prejudicial error in the admission of certain checks assertedly not related to the offense charged.

As to the Preliminary Examination

The state claims (1) that by not applying for a writ of prohibition within the time limited by section 999a, Penal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. StuartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. RAYYIS v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API