Rohl v. Leone
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
Plaintiff challenges the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. We review de novo the grant or denial of a motion for a directed verdict. Cacevic v Simplimatic Engineering Co (On Remand), 248 Mich App 670, 679; 645 NW2d 287 (2001). We further explained in Cacevic:
In reviewing the trial court’s decision, we view the evidence presented up to the time of the motion in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Dessart v. BurakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Elia v. HazenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cacevic v. Simplimatic Engineering Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kosmyna v. Botsford Community HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Ghaffari v. Turner Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Larry Shears v. Douglas BingamanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008