Cacevic v. Simplimatic Engineering Co.

ON REMAND

Before: Jansen, P.J., and Hood and Wilder, JJ. Wilder, J.

In this products liability case, we previously reversed a jury verdict of no cause of action and remanded for a new trial. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the Supreme Court vacated footnote 2 of our previous opinion and remanded to us so that we could consider “defendant’s argument that the judgment in its favor should be affirmed because it was entitled to a directed verdict.” Cacevic v Simpl[i]matic Engineering Co, 463 Mich 997 (2001). After considering this issue, we again reverse and remand for a new trial.

I. FACTS AND…