Legal Opinion

Christina A. v. Bloomberg

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided July 7, 2000No. Civ.A 00-4036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PIERSOL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs have sought to certify this suit as a class action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(2). Defendants oppose the certification of the class. The issues were briefed and oral argument was held on April 27, 2000. The Court declined to rule on the motion at that time, allowing Defendants to take discovery of the named Plaintiffs. After discovery of the Plaintiffs was completed, Plaintiffs renewed their motion for class certification and both parties submitted additional briefs. The Defendants continue to oppose…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Paxton v. Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Coley v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carson P. ex rel Foreman v. HeinemanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2007
  2. Schumacher v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2004
  3. Evans v. American Credit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2004
  4. Calogero v. Shows, Cali & Walsh, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  5. Fullmer v. A-1 Collection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API