Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Martel

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The ruling of the court in relation to the burden of proof was erroneous. Traveler’s Insurance Co. v. Greenough, ante, 391.

A new trial is not required, however, because we are of the opinion that the record contains no evidence whatever in support of the verdict returned by the jury. Both Martel and Dulac, being respectively the owner and driver of the truck, testified definitely that at the time of the accident it was being driven by Dulac upon business of his own, without the knowledge or consent of Martel, and contrary to the latter’s express orders. They also testified that it had never…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. KennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  2. Travelers Insurance v. MarcouxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API