Legal Opinion

Briggs v. . Briggs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.

The plaintiff’s contention that defendant is not entitled to support and counsel fees pending the litigation for the reason that she seeks no affirmative relief in her answer cannot be sustained. Medlin v. Medlin, 175 N. C., 529, 95 S. E., 857; Holloway v. Holloway, 214 N. C., 662. The plaintiff by his suit seeks to deprive the defendant of her legal right to support from him. He must furnish her with the necessary funds -with which to defend the action and to support herself pending the litigation.

The plaintiff’s contention that the judgment in the criminal action charging the plaintiff with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Holloway v. . HollowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Medlin v. . MedlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Hogsett v. HogsettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API