Goodall v. Norton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Mankato, Shissler, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
Action in the municipal court of the city of Mankato to recover $66.53, the balance of an account against the defendant in favor of T. R. Price, and assigned by him to the plaintiff.
*2The answer alleged, with other matters, that the defendant paid the account, except a balance of $14, to Mr. Price, before it was assigned. On the trial the defendant claimed that he had delivered to Mr. Price a check for $16.25 in part payment of the account, which he promised to credit thereon, but never did. The trial court instructed the jury to the effect that they must disregard the check, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Moore v. McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Jaffray & Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Teegarden v. Town of CaledoniaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Good v. SingletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lindquist v. DicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Berry v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LyonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Ideal Bakery v. SchryverWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Jaggar v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.