Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Portis
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, Presiding Judge:
This appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Civil Appellate Procedure Rule 1.203(A)(1)(a), 12 O.S.Supp. 1996, ch. 15, app. 2, after the trial court granted summary judgment to each party. Upon reconsideration of the issues, we grant the parties’ petitions for rehearing, withdraw our opinions of September 17 and November 5, 1996, and hereby issue the following opinion. Based on the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
I
FACTS
Defendants Dennis and Sheryle Portis (collectively, Portis) and plaintiff Bank of Oklahoma (BOK)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Retherford v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Ass'n of Professional Baseball Leagues, Inc. v. Very Minor Leagues, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Wachter v. Gratech Co., Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Nay v. First Financial Bank, FSBCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Pate v. AlianCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Branch v. Ameriresource Group, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.