Legal Opinion

Sanford v. White

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 1, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

This cause was tried late in October term, 1899, and there was a verdict, and judgment on the verdict, *929for the defendant. How, in this October term, 1900, the plaintiff has moved, on notice, for leave to file a motion for a new trial for fraud in the conduct of that trial, and has died an affidavit in support of this motion that he did not discover evidence of the fraud till January 28, 1900, and that he then proceeded herein at once. The whole of April term, 1900, has intervened. The proceeding invoked seems to be for leave to file a motion nunc pro tunc, which would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hickman v. Fort ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Fishburn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Mosseaux v. BrighamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  5. Scott v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1833

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. Seneca Engineering Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929
  2. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. StankusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API