Pixley v. . Clark
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPeokham, J.
Action for damages for flooding plaintiff’s land. The .defendants purchased of the plaintiff a small strip of land on the borders of the Oriskany creek, in Oneida county. The whole, strip so purchased they occupied by an embankment on that side of the creek, considerably higher than the natural bank, to prevent the overflow of the water caused by raising their dam. They raised their dam at four different times from 1853 to 1857 inclusive, in all fifty-eight and a half inches, so that the dam was then between nine and ten feet high. The embankment was some forty'feet at the base, in and prior…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayor of New-York v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
- Bellinger v. . the New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Goodale v. . TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. EastTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Sullivan v. . DunhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Forbell v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.