Legal Opinion
United States v. William A. Croft
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 12, 1985No. 83-3168PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The defendant-appellant, William Croft, appeals his conviction for one count of knowingly and unlawfully converting, to his own use, a “thing of value” of the Environmental Protection Agency (the services of Laurel Johnson), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (1982). We affirm.
I
The record reveals that in June 1980, the defendant, William Croft, was employed as an assistant professor in the Department of Veterinary Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. As a result of his extensive research in the area of urinary bladder cancer in animals, Croft had developed an…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States v. David N. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Dale J. Doerr, John Paul Doerr, Josephine Christofalos, Christa D. Pixley, and Archie J. PixleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek OdonerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Zenon HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Phillip Ray JeterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.