Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1989No. 54813PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

After an evidentiary hearing the motion court denied movant’s request for post conviction relief under Rule 27.26, repealed effective January 1, 1988, and replaced by Rule 29.15. He was tried and found guilty of attempted rape. The court rejected movant’s claim that his trial counsel “failed to undertake any pretrial investigation which would have materially helped his case.” The motion court found movant’s trial counsel did make reasonable investigation of the case and did discuss matters arising out of his investigation with movant prior to trial. It also found that movant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Mahaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Warren v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Stevenson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. State v. DarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API