Legal Opinion

Connecticut Co. v. City of Norwalk

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 16, 1915PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Public Utilities Commission requiring the plaintiff to lay two railway tracks upon a new highway bridge over the Norwalk River, taken by the plaintiff to and tried by the Superior Court in Fairfield County, Burpee, J.; the court held that § 4 of the Special Act of 1913, underlying the order in question, was unconstitutional and void, and rendered judgment for the plaintiff setting the order aside, from which the defendant appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Public Utilities Commission requiring the plaintiff to lay two railway tracks upon a new highway bridge over the Norwalk River, taken by the plaintiff to and tried by the Superior Court in Fairfield County, Burpee, J.; the court held that § 4 of the Special Act of 1913, underlying the order in question, was unconstitutional and void, and rendered judgment for the plaintiff setting the order aside, from which the defendant appealed. Reference may be had to 88 Conn. 472, 473, and to 89 Conn. 537, for statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtWheelek, J.

The Connecticut Company is a street-railway corporation which has for many years operated a single-track street-railway over the old Washington Street bridge, being a part of Washington Street, a highway in the city of Norwalk.

The General Assembly, in 1911, authorized the town of Norwalk, through its bridge committee, to construct a new bridge across the Norwalk River in place of the old Washington Street bridge. 16 Special Laws, p. 490.

In 1913 the General Assembly consolidated the municipalities in Norwalk into the City of Norwalk, transferring to it the authority of the town over this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Goodrich Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. President of the Monongahela Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Red "C" Oil Manufacturing Co. v. Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. City of New Haven v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API