Anniston Lincoln Mercury Dodge v. Conner
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff purchased a motor vehicle from the defendant dealer. The contract to purchase the vehicle contained an agreement to arbitrate disputes. The plaintiff filed an action alleging, among other things, fraud and other torts. The plaintiff resisted arbitration, and the trial court denied the defendant's motion to compel arbitration. The defendant appeals. The basic legal question presented on this appeal is whether the court or an arbitrator should determine the question of the validity of the agreement containing the arbitration provision.
The relevant facts are basically undisputed.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Three Valleys Municipal Water District v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Parkway Dodge, Inc. v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Green Tree Financial Corporatoin v. WamplerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Quality Truck and Auto Sales, Inc. v. YassineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Service Corp. Intern. v. FulmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Johnnie's Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.