Legal Opinion

Francis v. Commissioner of Correction

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 23, 2020No. 19-1033Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-1033 Francis v. Commissioner of Correction UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Burrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API