Legal Opinion

Polm v. Hession

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1949PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We are concerned here with a type of accident with which the courts have very frequently been called upon to deal, — a person falling in a place insufficiently lighted.

Plaintiff, together with an escort, visited defendant's tavern at the northwest corner of Chancellor Street and Bellevue Court, Philadelphia, on a Saturday evening at about 10:30 o'clock. There are three entrances to the tavern, two on the Bellevue Court side and one on Chancellor Street; plaintiff, who had never previously been on the premises, entered from Bellevue Court. While in the taproom she did not drink any alcoholic…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Bailey v. Alexander Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McDevitt v. Terminal Warehouse Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Just v. Sons of Italy HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Ellis v. DrabSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Hall v. GlickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Colangelo v. Penn Hills Center, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API