Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Boyd

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 29, 2001No. 00-2892Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

During jury selection at Kurt Johnson’s state murder trial, the court, with coun*362sel’s consent, conducted portions of the voir dire process in the hallway. Johnson was not present at the time, nor did he personally agree to this procedure. He now contends that his exclusion from portions of voir dire violated his due process rights and that he is entitled to a new trial. Furthermore, he claims that trial counsel’s failure to object to the unconventional voir dire procedure, and appellate counsel’s failure to raise the issue on direct appeal, violated his Sixth Amendment rights. We affirm…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. TiptonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API