Dugat v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of knowingly passing as true a forged check or draft and his punishment fixed at four years confinement in the penitentiary.
The evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the conviction. Appellant’s defense was alibi and that he was not the person who passed the forged instrument:—mistaken identity.
Appellant has several bills of exceptions. Each, in substance, is a recitation of the questions and answers to respective witnesses,—the first, in this way, containing about five pages of typewritten matter. Then follow numerous objections to the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dittfurth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Kaufman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Mason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Himmelfarb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Perryman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915