Ramotar v. Kroger Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Rampersand and Rohinika Ramotar sued The Kroger Company to recover for personal injuries Mr. Ramotar allegedly sustained when he fell after slipping on a puddle of oil at a Kroger store in Loganville, Georgia. Kroger filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted.1 The Ramotars appeal, contending that the trial court erred in finding that there was no constructive notice of the oil on the store’s floor. Because we find that an issue of fact remains regarding Kroger’s constructive knowledge of the alleged hazard, we reverse.
On appeal from the grant or denial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Shepard v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Davis v. Bruno's Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Food Lion, LLC v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Burnett v. Ingles Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pinder v. H & H Food Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Donastorg v. Rainbow USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Donastorg v. Rainbow USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Donna B. Pinder v. H&H Food Services, L.L.C., D/B/A Kentucky Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014