Pinder v. H & H Food Services, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MCMlLLIAN, Judge.
Donna Pinder appeals from the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment to H & H Food Services, LLC d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken (“H & H”), in her claim for injuries suffered in a fall on H & H’s premises in Vidalia, Georgia (the “Property’). We reverse for the reasons set forth below.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact as to any essential element of a claim and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant or denial of summary judgment, and we view the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Shackelford v. DeKalb Farmer's Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Christensen v. Overseas Partners Capital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Rossano v. American Legion Post No. 29Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Strauss v. City of LilburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Jeanette Bartenfeld v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- NORWICH Et Al. v. THE SHRIMP FACTORY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Milledgeville Manor Partners, LLC v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- AMANDA CREBS v. BASS PRO OUTDOOR WORLDCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.