Legal Opinion

Kerry G. v. Stacy C.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 5, 2018No. 117070PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold-Burger, C.J.:

Upon motion of a plaintiff, a district court may extend a protection from abuse (PFA) order for one year. K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 60-3107(e)(1). The issue presented in this case is determining what process is due to a defendant when a plaintiff files a request for the statutorily allowed extension of the PFA order. Here, the district court granted Kerry's request for a one-year extension of a PFA order against Stacy without making any factual findings, and without giving Stacy notice or a hearing. Stacy appeals contending: (1) the district court violated his due process rights…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. Neighbor v. Westar Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. Ullery v. OthickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. Kansas Department of Revenue v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burch v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. In re Marriage of HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. K.F. v. A.F.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API