Legal Opinion

State v. Armistead

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1973No. 732SC544Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

There is no dispute as to material issues of fact. Both assignments of . error present to this Court the question of whether the three cannons found by defendants in the Roanoke River are archaeological artifacts within the purview of G.S. 121-22 and consequently, whether the State is the owner thereof. Defendants’ first assignment of error is to the granting of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff based on the finding of fact that the cannons were archaeological artifacts and the conclusion of law that they were underwater archaeological artifacts within the meaning of G.S.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Galligan v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Person v. Garrett, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API