Legal Opinion

Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Peacock Engineering Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 10, 1993No. 1-92-1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda

Defendant, Peacock Engineering Company, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware, and from the denial of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the denial of an award of prejudgment interest. We affirm.

The issue in this case is whether, where a common carrier delivers a shipment without a demand for payment together with a bill of lading marked "collect,” and the consignee accepts delivery, the consignee is liable for the freight charges.

Plaintiff alleged the following in its amended…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Export Drum Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jiffy Lube International, Inc. v. AgarwalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Marine Bank v. Taz's Trucking Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. E.W. Wylie Corp. v. Menard, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API