Legal Opinion
Anderson Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 3, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 56 C 463PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
Findings of Fact
On Issues Raised by Complaint
1. This suit was instituted by the plaintiffs, The Anderson Company and Productive Inventions, both Indiana corporations, the latter having been merged into the former so that plaintiff, The Anderson Company, hereinafter called plaintiff, remains. The defendants are Sears Roebuck and Co., a New York corporation, and The Zaiger Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation. The Complaint charges infringement of U. S. Letters Patent 2,596,063 by reason of sales by both Sears and Zaiger of windshield wiper blades…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Imhaeuser v. BuerkSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson Company v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Zaiger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Anderson Company and Productive Inventions, Inc. v. Trico Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1986
- WR Grace & Co. v. Park Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.