Legal Opinion

Dolores Tapia-Martinez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 27, 2007No. 05-4413PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, Dolores Tapia-Martinez, seeks judicial review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), denying her second motion to reopen as numerically barred under 8 C.F.R. § 1-3.2(c)(2). Petitioner asserts that because her second motion to reopen is based on ineffective assistance of counsel, equitable tolling should apply. Petitioner also argues that review by a three-member panel pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003. l(e)(6)(v) is warranted. We AFFIRM.

I. Background

The facts were laid out in a prior appeal:

Petitioner is a native and citizen of Mexico.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Daniels v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Neverson v. FarquharsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Yuri Harchenko, Oleksandr Harchenko, and Tetiana Harchenko v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Barry v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Woodrow Roberson v. Jeremy MacnicolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Muhammad Rais v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Mezo v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Koussan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API