Legal Opinion
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Second Intermediate Account of Chase Manhattan Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1671Memorandum: In a prior appeal, we reversed that part of a judgment in which Surrogate’s Court granted the objections to the superseding account filed by petitioner (trustee) and imposed a surcharge plus interest and commissions based upon its determination that the trustee should have divested itself of a concentration of stock of Eastman Kodak Company on or before January 31, 1974 (Matter of Chase Manhattan Bank, 26 AD3d 824, 827-828 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 824 [2006], rearg denied 7 NY3d 922 [2006]). In the instant appeal, objectants appeal from a subsequent order of the Surrogate granting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re the Estate of PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- In re the Estate of McCranorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Probate of the Will of KaufmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate & Final Accounts of HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate & Final Accounts of HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (Campbell)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017