Legal Opinion

Cain v. Cain

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1978No. 11534PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, Barbara A. Cain (Mrs. Cain), sued defendant-appellee, William J. Cain (Mr. Cain) for accrued alimony. Prom an adverse trial court decision on the ground of laches, she appeals. We reverse.

This suit being based on a California divorce decree, the controlling issue is whether the California statute proscribing retroactive cancellation of accrued alimony applies.

Mrs. Cain was granted $165 per month as alimony in a 1958 decree. Mr. Cain made no payments. He claims that he thought the obligation was to last only one year. Mrs. Cain made no effort to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Morris v. RossNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Corliss v. CorlissNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mechem v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Dirks v. Dirks (In Re Dirks)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Butcher v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API