Cain v. Cain
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASLEY, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant, Barbara A. Cain (Mrs. Cain), sued defendant-appellee, William J. Cain (Mr. Cain) for accrued alimony. Prom an adverse trial court decision on the ground of laches, she appeals. We reverse.
This suit being based on a California divorce decree, the controlling issue is whether the California statute proscribing retroactive cancellation of accrued alimony applies.
Mrs. Cain was granted $165 per month as alimony in a 1958 decree. Mr. Cain made no payments. He claims that he thought the obligation was to last only one year. Mrs. Cain made no effort to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Morris v. RossNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Corliss v. CorlissNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Garcia v. Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Mechem v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Dirks v. Dirks (In Re Dirks)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Butcher v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.