Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. North German Lloyd, etc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 17, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

-This action is brought by Meyer Goldsmith, the owner, and Dan Kalahr, Eugene Kalahr, and John H. Topliam, the care-takers of certain cattle and sheep shipped by Goldsmith on board the steam-ship Persian Monarch, to be transported therein from New York to London. The defendant is the owner of the steam-ship Hannover, which vessel, when disabled at sea, was fallen in with by the Persian Monarch during the voyage aforesaid, and by her towed into a port of safety.

The libel sets forth the bill of lading -under which the cattle and sheep were shipped, containing the following clause;

“The steamer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mason v. Ship BlaireauSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  2. The Nathaniel HooperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1839
  3. The ColonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Compagnie Commerciale de Transport a Vapeur Francaise v. Charente Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893
  2. National Steamship Co. v. The HeklaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1894
  3. The MenomineeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. The MenomineeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API