Historical Pub. Co. v. Jones Bros. Pub. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
On reargument.
1Per curiam
This motion for reargument raises one question that may need a short explanation. The Historical Publishing Company’s appeal was taken within 30 days from the entry of the decree below, but the Jones Publishing Company did not appeal until about four months thereafter. The Historical 'Company now urges that the plaintiff’s appeal was too late, and asks us to revise our own decree accordingly. We neither noticed nor considered the point before, and hence the language of Historical Publishing Co. v. Jones Publishing Co., 231 Fed. 638, - C. C. A. -, must be understood as used without reference…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Scriven v. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904
- Ward Baking Co. v. Weber Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Historical Pub. Co. v. Jones Bros. Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Kelsey Wheel Co. v. Universal Rim Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. ArnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Groblewski v. John Chmiell Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
- Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939