Legal Opinion
Heyden Chemical Corp. v. Clark
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
The defendant moves for judgment dismissing the complaint upon the grounds that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action.
The plaintiff brought this action under Section 9(a) of the Trading With The Enemy Act of 1917, as amended, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, Section 9(a), and the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, for a judgment “establishing that plaintiff has an interest or right in or to” certain shares of stock, “and a right to purchase” the shares, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Singer v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Clark v. PropperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Markham v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Miyuki Okihara v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1947
- Schrijver v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bantel v. McGrath Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- McGrath v. American Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1953
- Taterka v. BrownellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- In re the Accounting of MulliganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952