Legal Opinion · Concurrence

VINTAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. Hayes

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 14, 2007No. 2060284Published

1ConcurrenceMoore, Judge

I concur in the main opinion’s decision to reverse the trial court’s judgment and to remand the cause for the trial court to enter a new judgment limiting the employee to permanent-partial-disability benefits as set out in “the schedule,” Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-57(a)(3)a. I write specially to address the perceived harshness or unfairness of applying the schedule to this case.

Before the advent of workers’ compensation laws, employees injured in work-relat*1208ed accidents depended on the common law or the Employers’ Liability Act, Title 26, § 326 et seq., Ala.Code 1940, as their exclusive forms of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Ex Parte Drummond Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Leach Manufacturing Company v. PuckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API