Goo v. Arakawa.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
POLLACK, J.
This case addresses the issue of the procedure that an appellate court should follow when a ease becomes moot on appeal and one party seeks vacatur of the lower court’s judgment.
We hold that the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) erred in vacating the circuit court’s judgments and December 31, 2008 Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment in this case and remanding the ease for dismissal. In addition, we conclude that the ICA did not err in affirming the circuit court’s denial of plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees.
I. Background
A
On Maui, approval of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Valero Terrestrial Corp. v. PaigeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- American Games, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. Trade Products, Inc., and Stuart Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Delaware Public Schools LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024