Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ehret Estate

Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County

Decided April 27, 1966No. 116Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Lefever, J.,

All of the judges of this court agree “that the preferable rule would be to allow payment of the interim commissions claimed by the trustee” on principal in this test case. However, the majority and the minority part company on the effect of Scott Estate, 418 Pa. 332 (1965). The majority holds that Scott Estate squarely decides that allowance of the disputed commission is prohibited.

At first blush, this would seem to be accurate, for Mr. Chief Justice Bell stated at page 339:

“We hold that Williamson Estate directly controls the instant case and that the 1953 Act…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Catherwood TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. CARPENTER v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Cahen v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Demorest v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API