Legal Opinion
LaCroix v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1962No. Docket 34, 35, Calendar 49,614, 49,615PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
Defendant railroad company is here on appeal, by leave granted, from an order entered by the trial court requiring defendant to produce stenographic statements taken from the plaintiffs by defendant’s agent, so that the plaintiffs could examine and copy the same. The trial judge entered the order under section 6 of Court Rule No 35 (1945). *
The cases involved are trespass actions for personal injuries to plaintiffs Walter H. LaCroix and Mary I. LaCroix.
The declarations of the plaintiff allege that at approximately 4 o’clock in the morning of April 25, 1958, the vehicle of the plaintiff Walter…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Breker v. RosemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Christie v. BD. OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY REGENTSMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- J. A. Utley Co. v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Powers v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Pearson v. Vander WierMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Otto Taylor Construction Co. v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- LaCroix v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.