Legal Opinion
PERRY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 9, 2024No. 2:21-cv-11028Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SAMUEL PERRY, Plaintise, Civil Action No, 21-11028 (TXN) (AME) □□ OPINION UNITED STATES PARCEL SERVICE, JOHN DOE 1-10, and ABC CORP. 1-10, Defendants. NEALS, District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on Defendant United Parcel Service’s (“Defendant” or “UPS”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Samuel Perry’s (“Plaintiff”) Second amended complaint (the “SAC”) (ECF No. 28) filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 33). Plaintiff opposed (ECF No. 34), and UPS replied. (ECF No. 35). Jurisdiction and venue are proper…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.