Legal Opinion

Catlett Et Ux. v. White Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 23, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

— The bill filed in this case purports to be for specific performance of a contract to convey land. The suit was brought by the vendee against the vendor. Vendee was in default in paying the required installments of the purchase price, but attempted to excuse the default by objecting to vendor’s title. The objections to the title were met by the vendor, notwithstanding which the vendee continued to refuse to make payments as required by the contract.

Vendor filed an answer seeking affirmative relief on a counter-claim for the unpaid purchase price against the vendees. Decree pro eonfesso was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Day Et Ux. v. WeadockSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fagg Mill Work & Lumber Co. v. GreerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Woodruff v. Lantana Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Bailey v. NewmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API