Legal Opinion

Day Et Ux. v. Weadock

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 28, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This is a ease wherein rescission and cancellation was sought by appellants. Two contracts are involved, by the terms °of which appellants agreed to purchase and the appellees agreed to sell, two lots in Casa Loma, a subdivision of the Town of Boynton, in Palm Beach County. Appellees, as defendants in the court below, sought affirmative relief in the suit against the appellants for the balance of the purchase price due on the contracts. The Chancellor denied all relief sought by each party, and dismissed the bill. An appeal from the final decree brings the ease here.

Errors are assigned on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commercial Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. StockingIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Southern Colonization Co. v. DerflerSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Sun City Holding Company v. SchoenfeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  5. Birmingham Warehouse & Elevator Co. v. Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Gardiner v. GoertnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Bullock v. HarwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  4. Nichols Et Vir. v. BodenweinSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Sutton v. Gulf Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API