Legal Opinion

Clarion County v. Clarion Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1908No. Appeal, No. 210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 210, Oct. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from judgment - of Superior Court, April T., 1908, No. 233, affirming judgment of C. P. Clarion Co., May T., 1908, No. 11, for defendant on case stated in suit of Clarion County v. Clarion Township. Appeal from Superior Court. Error assigned was the judgment of the Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

opinion op the superior court.

Per Curiam :

The general question for decision in this case is, whether or *351not it is the duty of Clarion county to repair and maintain a portion of a certain turnpike that was condemned, and for which condemnation damages were paid by the county. The decision of this question, it is conceded by counsel for appellant, depends upon the proper determination of the question whether the Act of April 20, 1905, P. L. 237, and the Act of April 25, 1907, P. L. 104, are constitutional. The court below decided both questions in the affirmative. The precise question was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Stegmaier v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Evans v. PhillipiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Searight's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. In re Greenfield AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TassoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Reber's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Winters v. KoontzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Allegheny County Commissioners' CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Somerset Township Supervisors v. Somerset County CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API