Legal Opinion
Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Woodard
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided March 6, 2012No. 2011AP135PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKessler, J.
¶ 1. London Woodard appeals an order of the circuit court denying her motion for attorney's fees and costs. Woodard contends that because she was a "prevailing party" in her litigation with Credit Acceptance Corporation (Credit Acceptance), she is entitled to attorney's fees and costs under the Wis*550consin Consumer Act (the WCA). Because Credit Acceptance has not been found to have violated the WCA, we affirm the circuit court.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. This appeal stems from a deficiency action in which Credit Acceptance sought recovery under a retail installment contract between Credit Acceptance and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Wisconsin National Bank v. NicolaouWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Welin v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Coady v. Cross Country Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- Suburban State Bank v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nelson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Sands v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013