Legal Opinion

Wien & Malkin, LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 18, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered March 8, 2002, which declared, inter alia, that plaintiffs’ proposed proxy solicitation materials complied with disclosure protocols set forth in a confirmed arbitration award and therefore may be transmitted to the partners entitled to vote whether to terminate defendant without cause, and denied defendant’s cross motion to, inter alia, compel arbitration, and order and judgment (one paper), same court and Justice, entered September 20, 2002, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ application for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Ronnen v. Ajax Electric Motor Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Mionis v. Bank Julius Baer & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Wien & Malkin v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API