Reinhart v. Bradshaw
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. Plaintiffs’ title was one which is recognized by the courts and which is protected by our statute. (People v. Shearer, 30 Cal. 657; Moon v. Rollins, 36 Cal. 333;1 Bush y.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. Plaintiffs’ title was one which is recognized by the courts and which is protected by our statute. (People v. Shearer, 30 Cal. 657; Moon v. Rollins, 36 Cal. 333;1 Bush y. Marshal, 6 How. 288; Sparrow v. Strong, 3 Wall. 104; Lamb v. Davenport, 1 Saw. 622; Courtney v. Turner, 12 Nev. 348; Atherton v. Fowler, 96 U. S. 513; Nickals v. Winn, 17 Nev. 194; 1 Comp. L. 58, et seq., vol. 2, sec. 3825.) The court below found as a fact that defendant ousted the plaintiffs, and…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Belknap, C. J.:
The parties hereto were tenants in common of the tract of land in controversy. At the time plaintiffs acquired their interest, defendant was residing upon the premises. In consideration of his occupancy, and of the use- of certain farming implements and horses owned by the parties as tenants in common, and of other matters immaterial here, defendant agreed to cultivate the land and return plaintiffs one fourth of the crop of grain grown thereon. Under this agreement defendant occupied and cultivated the land for two- seasons, and engaged to do so for a third; but…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Atherton v. FowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Nickals v. WinnNevada Supreme Court · 1882
- Emerson v. SansomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- Binning v. Miller, Water Division SuperintendentWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- Brown v. KillabrewNevada Supreme Court · 1893
- Lytle v. DevlinNevada Supreme Court · 1911