Williams v. Rogers
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
According to the complainant’s own testimony he and the defendant, at the close of the alleged partnership transactions, met and adjusted the partnership accounts; the fact and amount of the loss was ascertained; and the defendant premised to pay the complainant (who had put in all the cash which the business used) his one-half part of the loss. Not only so, but the complainant testifies that the defendant actually paid on account of the loss the sum of $400.
If partners settle their accounts and admit a balance, an action at law will lie to recover such balance. Redden v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Finley v. LynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Jackson v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- McGehee v. DoughertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mack v. WhiteSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933