Legal Opinion

Mack v. White

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 14, 1933No. 149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Two questions are presented by the motion:

1. Is this Court of Law without jurisdiction in the matter because it appears that the note upon which the suit is based was given “in connection with and as a part of certain partnership transactions ?”

2. If this Court has jurisdiction in the matter, is the claim of the defendant that there is due to him from the plaintiff an unascertained amount arising from the partnership a sufficient defense to the action?

The questions will be considered in this order, for upon = the determination of the first…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crater v. . BiningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Grigsby's ex. v. NanceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  3. Wharton v. DouglassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  4. Russell v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  5. Appleby v. BarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drenis v. HaligiannisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Curley v. Brignoli Curley & Roberts AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Strickler v. Sussex Life Care AssociatesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API