Rockford, R.I. St. L.R.R. Co. v. . Boody
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends that both the order of arrest and the warrant of attachment issued in this case were irregular or illegal, so that the court ought to have set aside both, upon the ground that both remedies could not lawfully be allowed in the same suit. Upon his application to set aside both, the court at Special Term required the plaintiff to elect which remedy it would retain, and upon its election to retain the arrest, ordered the warrant of attachment to be set aside. The plaintiff having acquiesced in this order and there being only the arrest left in force, the defendant cannot…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Butts v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. ShermanNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Coleman v. . Second Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Port v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Brinley v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1801
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosen v. SteinNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Commercial National Bank of Cleveland v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1898
- Fowler v. Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Voorhees v. OlmsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1875