Goldstein v. Alodex Corporation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the motions of defendants Richard M. Paget and Charles E. Dykes for summary judgment on their cross-claims against defendant Alodex Corporation (Alodex). Both Mr. Paget and Mr. Dykes seek indemnity from Alodex in connection with the reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by them in defending against the plaintiffs’ claims in both the Goldstein and the Clemmer actions. There are no factual disputes in connec tion with the motions of Mr. Paget and Mr. Dykes; the only issue is an issue of law as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Escott v. BarChris Construction CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Feit v. Leasco Data Processing Equipment CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Kramer v. Scientific Control Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stull v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- B & B Investment Club v. Kleinert's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Laven v. FlanaganDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- In Re Friedman's, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.