Legal Opinion
Flores v. Lynch
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 21, 2015No. Case No. CV 85-04544 DMG (Ex)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I
INTRODUCTION
“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it. ”
—Mahatma Gandhi
On February 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion to enforce the parties’ 18-year-old consent decree (“the Agreement”) against Defendants Jeh Johnson and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and its subordinate entities, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”).1 See Plaintiffs’ First Set of Exhibits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald MathisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Barajas-AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Lockett v. EricsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Mortgage-Backed Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Pegasus Satellite Television, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Castro v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- A.E.S.E. v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022